Cases study 4 :The Associated Press vs. Fairey

-
copyright infringement
Photograph: Mannie Garcia – 2006 (via The New York Times); Poster: Shephard Fairey – 2008 (via Wikipedia)




Case
The famous street artist Shephard Fairey created the "Hope" poster during President Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. The design rapidly became a symbol for Obama’s campaign, technically independent of the campaign but with its approval.

In January 2009, the photograph that Fairey originally used was proved to be taken by Associated Press (An international news agency based in New York Cit) employee Mannie Garcia. The associated press then demanded compensation for the use of Garcia's photo because it is copyrighted.

Associated Press claimed it owned the copyright and demands compensation from Fairy who has been selling multiple copies of posters and stickers fro thousands of dollars. Fairey responded with the defense of fair use, claiming his work didn’t reduce the value of the original photograph,as we know fair use is a legal concept that allows exceptions to copyright laws based on how much of the original is used.

Held
Although there wasn’t a court case and an actual verdict, this case created a lot of expound around the value of work in these copyright battles. It’s unlikely that Garcia’s work could have ever reached the level of fame it did, if not for Fairey’s poster. Garcia himself stated he was “so proud of the photograph and that Fairey did what he did artistically with it, and the effect it has had,” but still had a problem with the fact that Fairey took the image without permission and without credit for it’s originator.

Copyright Act 1987 Section 36(1)
The Copyright Act 1987 states that an infringement occurs when a person does something without the licence or permission or consent of the copyright owner.

The copyright in a work is infringed when a person who:
(i)not being the owner of the copyright 
(ii)without consent or license of the owner of the copyright,



Copyright Act 1987 Section 13(2)
Certain conduct will not be considered as infringement of copyright. This provision provide defences to any allegation of infringement. 

FAIR USE
Where a copyrighted material is used for for purposes of non-profit research, private study, criticism, review or the reporting of current events. If such use is public, then it must be accompanied by an acknowledgement of the title of the work and its authorship.



Point of view
Based on the case above (The Associated Press vs. Fairey), had involve in Copyright Act 1987 - Section 36(1) Copyright infringement.

Associated Press(An international news agency based in New York Cit) got the right to sue Fairey (The famous street artist ) although the outcome of the case regarding copyright infringement is unknown because it was privately settled, it is thought that revenue produced from the "Hope" poster was split between Fairey and the Associated Press but Fairey took the image without permission and without credit for it’s originator. 

Why credit is important ? Because when you share artwork online without crediting the artist, it has many negative ramifications on their career. Besides, whenever you are using someone artwork that not belongs to you might lead you become an art thief. Most of people won't look into the source of the art beforehand to make sure it's legit when purchasing these products and only think about how cool it looks. Imagine how it feels if your artwork get used by others and they stated it’s belongs to them. Will you feel bad and depressed? Therefore, it is advisable that all of us give proper credits to the owner or innovate something by using the ideas instead of copying it directly. If you're an artist, do not underestimate the value of your work, you have every right to protect it. Its yours, no matter how many times people violate your right to ownership. Don't forget that you have something of value, that people will try to take for their own gain. Once again, I would like to say that every owner should credit their own artwork if they don’t want their own personal belongings get raided every day!




references :

https://99designs.com/blog/tips/5-famous-copyright-infringement-cases/

https://prezi.com/aybkk5j_6kuk/the-associated-press-vs-fairey/

https://cpyrightvisualarts.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/shepherd-fairey-vs-associated-press/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMCxtFmzmxM

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cases study 7 : Vanilla Ice vs. David Bowie/Freddie Mercury (1991)

-
Image
Case  In 1981, Queen and David Bowie released the song “Under Pressure”. The song reached number one on UK music charts.  In 1990, Vanilla Ice released his hit single “Ice Ice Baby” the beat the song was the same as “Under Pressure”. But Ice famously insisted that the two melodies are distinct because he added a beat between notes. A live version appears on the album Extremely Live, while a rap rock version appears on the album Hard to Swallow, under the title "Too Cold"  Queen and David Bowie sued the signer for sampling the beat to the song without permission or a license. Ice later claimed that this rationale was merely a joke. Representatives for Queen and Bowie weren't laughing and threatened a copyright infringement suit.  Interesting Facts ：Both songs, "Ice, Ice, Baby" and "Under Pressure" were number one hits. The song boosted the sales of the album which went to sell over 7 million copies. These songs were also
Read more

Case Study 1 : Rogers v. Koons

-
Image
Photograph: Art Rogers – 1985; Polychrome: Jeff Koons – 1988 (both via The Design Observer Group ) About the Case  This case is about Photographer Art Rogers shot a photograph of a couple (Jim Scanlon and his wife ) holding a line of puppies in a row and sold it for use in greeting cards and similar products. Internationally, the famous artist Jeff Koons in the process of creating an exhibit on the banality of everyday items, ran across Rodgers’ photograph and used it to create a set of statues based on the image. Jeff Koons asked his assistants to copy as much detail as possible from the photographs. The only changes made during the transition were larger noses on the puppies, blue fur, and the man and woman had flowers in their hair. The sculpture was named "String of Puppies" and became a success. Reportedly, Koons sold three of the sculptures for $367,000.  Jeff Koons sold several of these structures, making a significant profit. Upon discovering the copy
Read more

Case study 5 : Modern Dog Design vs. Target Corporation ( 2011 )

-
Image
Illustrations: Modern Dog – 2008; T-shirt: Target (both via Business Insider ) Case  There is an ongoing case regarding how the Disney/Target corporation allegedly infringed on Modern Dog Corporation, a small Seattle based company that produced a book of dog sketches and graphic illustrations.  Seattle design firm Modern Dog utilized a series of sketches of dogs in their compendium put out by Chronicle Books in 2008. Disney/Target corporation later created a kids shirt with a similar dog-drawing collage on the front. Some of the dog sketches are flipped, but the majority of them are very similar to the sketches in the Modern Dog book. The illustrations from that design have been used in a T-shirt produced by Disney/Target for sale.  In the end, Modern Dog Company got their justice, because Modern Dog was the 1st ones to create the pictures. Disney and Target used the pictures for sale, without giving any credit to Modern Dog.  Held  This is a pending case, so
Read more